Collectibility Assessment
Every lawsuit has a price tag the legal industry refuses to read: what the defendant could actually pay. A collectibility assessment documents it before the retainer is signed, reachable equity after the exemptions actually in force, the creditor stack in recording order, entity wrappers, and which direction the estate is moving. Flat fee. The defendant is never contacted.
Quick Answer
A collectibility assessment from U.S. Asset Records costs $195 flat-fee and is delivered in 24 to 72 hours. It converts a named defendant into a priced target: real property read against the exemption and entireties rules of the state where each parcel sits, the existing creditor stack of mortgages, judgment liens, tax liens, and UCC filings in priority order, the defendant’s own judgment history including unsatisfied writs, entity wrappers flagged for charging order analysis, and transfer velocity dated against the dispute. Employment verification is not offered and bank data is GLBA-protected; both limits are printed, not blurred. The defendant is never contacted.
Is this defendant actually worth suing?
That is the question this report exists to answer with instruments instead of instinct, and the honest framework has five parts. Reachable equity, not raw ownership: every parcel is read against the exemption law of the state where it sits, an unlimited Texas homestead, Florida’s constitutional shield, Oregon’s newly indexed figure, entireties title in states like Maryland, because owned and reachable are different numbers. The creditor stack: mortgages, prior judgment liens, tax liens, and UCC positions in recording order, since enforcement pays the line in sequence and arriving fifth is litigating for the four ahead. Track record: the defendant’s existing judgments and returned writs, the most honest collectibility signal in the public record. Wrappers: LLC and trust title that swaps levy for charging order. Velocity: recording dates showing whether the estate is holding still or already moving to family. Laid against expected fees, those five facts price the case, and sometimes the answer they support is do not file, which is the cheapest advice a plaintiff will ever buy.
Collectibility Snapshot
| The equation | Case value equals merits multiplied by collectibility; this documents the second term |
|---|---|
| Reachable equity | Every parcel read against the exemptions actually in force where it sits |
| Exemption spread | Texas and Florida shields, Oregon’s indexed figure, entireties states |
| The stack | Mortgages, prior judgments, tax liens, and UCC in recording order |
| Track record | Unsatisfied judgments and returned writs against the same defendant |
| Wrappers | LLC and trust title flagged for charging order analysis |
| Velocity | Transfer recording dates laid against the dispute timeline |
| Limit one | Employment verification is not offered; wage prospects read only from records |
| Limit two | Bank data is GLBA-protected; discovery is aimed by this map, not replaced |
| Turnaround | 24 to 72 hours, $195 flat fee |
Five Things That Decide Collectibility Cases
- Merits without collectibility is half a valuation. The industry models one and bills for ignoring the other.
- Owned and reachable are different numbers. Exemption law is local, and the state library behind this report reads each parcel under its own rules.
- Priority is destiny. Fifth in the recording order means funding the first four’s recovery.
- Past creditors already ran the experiment. Unsatisfied judgments are the record’s own collectibility verdict.
- Sometimes the answer is do not file. The report that says so pays for itself a hundred times over.
Collectibility Pricing
| Report | Price | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Skip Trace | $95 | Locating the subject before searching |
| Asset Profile Report | $195 | United States, pre-suit and post-judgment matters, statewide, nationwide |
| FCRA Creditor-Status Profile | $295 | Permissible-purpose collection of an existing judgment |
| Real Property Intel Package | $595 | One property, 30-year chain of title, liens, comparables |
Published flat fees. No litigation encouragement, no modeled scores without instruments, no consultation gates. Findings carry citations, and the filing decision belongs to counsel.
The Question That Prices Every Lawsuit
A case is worth its merits multiplied by its collectibility, and the legal industry only models half of that equation. Firms run conflicts, research liability, and draft demand letters against a defendant nobody has priced. Then the judgment arrives, the writ comes back empty, and the file teaches an expensive lesson the record could have taught for $195: a verdict against a defendant with nothing reachable is a receipt, not a recovery. A collectibility assessment documents the other half of the equation before the retainer is signed, and the collection-odds guide explains the doctrine this report applies to one named defendant.
The assessment is not a credit score and not a guess. It is the defendant’s recorded world read the way an enforcement lawyer will eventually have to read it: what exists, what is reachable after exemptions, who already has a claim on it, whether it sits inside an entity wrapper, and which direction it has been moving. Plaintiffs use it to decide whether to file. Contingency counsel use it to decide whether to invest. Defendants and insurers read the same map in reverse to price settlement, because nothing focuses a negotiation like both sides knowing exactly what enforcement would find.
Reachable Is Not the Same as Owned: The Exemption Layer
Raw ownership flatters the picture; exemption law corrects it, and exemption law is ferociously local. A defendant with a paid-off house is a strong target in one state and nearly untouchable in another: Texas shields an unlimited-value urban homestead on up to ten acres, Florida’s protection is constitutional and famous, Oregon’s exemption quadrupled in 2025 and now moves every July, and states like Maryland pair modest exemptions with a tenancy by the entireties shield that puts genuinely marital property outside a one-spouse judgment altogether. The assessment reads every parcel against the rules actually in force where it sits, which is exactly what the 50-state library behind this report, Texas, Florida, Oregon, Maryland, and the rest, was built to do.
The output is a different number than a property report gives: not what the defendant owns, but the equity a judgment could actually reach, parcel by parcel, with vesting read on every deed because entireties title, trust title, and entity title each change the answer. That number, laid beside likely fees, is the case’s real price tag.
The Creditor Stack: Where You Would Stand in Line
The second correction is priority. A defendant can own plenty and still be a poor target because earlier creditors already hold it: the mortgage and the HELOC, the recorded judgment liens from suits that finished before yours started, the tax liens that outrank nearly everything, and the UCC filings pledging the business assets to a lender who perfected years ago. Enforcement pays in recording order, and a plaintiff who would arrive fifth in line is litigating for the benefit of the four ahead.
The assessment documents that stack instrument by instrument: every encumbrance in priority order against every asset found, plus the defendant’s existing judgment history, which answers a question merits research never asks, how have this defendant’s other creditors fared. A trail of unsatisfied judgments and returned writs is the most honest collectibility signal that exists, and it is sitting in the public record with case numbers attached. Where a single parcel carries the case, the $595 single-property investigation runs its full 30-year chain and encumbrance stack.
Wrappers, Velocity, and the Honest Limits
Two more facts finish the price. Wrappers: assets inside an LLC or trust change the remedy menu from levy to charging order, and the charging order assessment covers the formation-state, membership, and contents questions that decide how much the wrapper is really worth to the defendant. Velocity: recording dates show which direction the estate is moving, and a defendant who began deeding parcels to family the month the dispute surfaced is simultaneously a worse target and a better one, thinner on paper today, but generating the fraudulent transfer timeline that unwinds the moves tomorrow. Both cut into the filing decision, and both are dated facts, not impressions.
The limits are printed rather than blurred. This is a records product, not legal advice, and the filing decision belongs to counsel. Employment verification is not offered, so wage-garnishment prospects are assessed only as far as the record carries them, recorded income streams like entity-held rentals rather than paycheck locates. And bank balances are GLBA-protected and not sold at any price; what post-judgment discovery later compels is aimed by this map, not replaced by it. A defendant who cannot be located at all starts with the $95 skip trace instead, because an assessment of a ghost prices nothing.
What This Market Sells, Read Carefully
Litigation priced blind. Demand letters and complaints go out every day against defendants nobody has assessed, because the industry bills for pursuing, not for pricing. The result is a national inventory of unsatisfied judgments that a $195 report would have predicted.
Nobody sells the no. A provider paid to investigate has no incentive to tell you the defendant is judgment-proof, so most reports read like encouragement. The most valuable line this report can contain is the one that saves a client six figures in fees, and it gets written when the record supports it.
Scores dressed as searches. Some services return a modeled likelihood with no instruments behind it. A number without citations cannot be tested, and untested numbers are how bad cases get funded.
The counter-position: reachable equity computed under the exemptions actually in force, the creditor stack in recording order, wrappers and velocity dated, honest limits printed, and a documented source behind every line. The full standard is on what a professional asset search company delivers.
What the Assessment Documents
| Jurisdiction | What lives there |
|---|---|
| Exemption-adjusted equity | Parcel-by-parcel reachable value under the law of each situs state |
| Vesting flags | Entireties, trust, and entity title that change what a judgment touches |
| The creditor stack | Every encumbrance in priority order, instrument numbers attached |
| Judgment history | Prior awards, satisfactions, and returned writs against the defendant |
| Wrapper entities | LLCs and trusts holding assets, mapped for charging order analysis |
| Transfer velocity | Dated conveyances showing which way the estate is moving |
Collectibility Assessment Questions
How much does a collectibility assessment cost?
$195 flat-fee, delivered in 24 to 72 hours. The FCRA-compliant Creditor-Status Profile for active collection is $295, a skip trace when the defendant cannot be located is $95, and a single-parcel deep investigation is $595. Every figure is published on the order page. No consultation call, no percentage of anything.
What is a collectibility assessment?
A records investigation that prices a named defendant before or after judgment: reachable equity computed under the exemption and entireties rules of each parcel’s state, the existing creditor stack in recording order, the defendant’s own judgment history, entity wrappers, and transfer velocity. It is the documented half of the equation, case value equals merits times collectibility, that litigation planning usually skips.
When should it be ordered, before filing or after judgment?
Both moments use it, differently. Pre-suit, it decides whether the case is worth bringing and arms the demand letter with specifics. Post-judgment, it converts a paper award into an enforcement sequence, which lien to record where, what a writ would actually reach. Contingency counsel run it before investing, and defense and insurers read the same map to price settlement.
What does judgment-proof actually mean?
That everything the defendant owns is either exempt, encumbered ahead of you, or wrapped. It is a conclusion this report can support with instruments: homestead equity under the state’s shield, vehicles under the exemption cap, wages beyond what the record shows, and parcels already mortgaged past their value. When the record says it, the report says it plainly, because a client saved from a dead case is the cheapest win available.
How do Texas and Florida homesteads affect the answer?
Dramatically, and honestly stated: Texas protects an unlimited-value urban homestead on up to ten acres, and Florida’s shield is constitutional. A defendant whose wealth sits inside those protections can be rich and nearly unreachable at once. The assessment does not pretend otherwise; it reads each parcel under its own state’s law, flags entireties title where states like Maryland apply it, and lets the reachable number, not the gross number, price the case.
The defendant already has judgments against them. Good sign or bad?
Both, and the report separates them. Bad: recorded judgment liens ahead of yours take priority, and a trail of returned writs is the record’s own verdict on collectibility. Useful: satisfactions show what pressure worked before, and the existing docket maps which assets other creditors have already tested. Either way it is evidence, with case numbers, that merits research never surfaces.
What if the assets are inside an LLC?
Then the remedy conversation changes from levy to charging order, and the assessment flags every wrapper it finds: formation state, the single-member question, and what the entity holds. The charging order assessment carries that full doctrine; this report tells you it is needed before the complaint is drafted rather than after.
Can you verify employment for wage garnishment?
No, employment verification is not a service this firm offers, and the report says so rather than implying otherwise. Wage prospects are assessed only as far as the record carries them, recorded income streams such as entity-held rentals, existing garnishment filings in the defendant’s judgment history, and business roles the filings disclose. Bank balances are GLBA-protected besides; post-judgment discovery compels what this map aims at.
Is the defendant notified of the assessment?
No. Every finding is drawn from public records and licensed databases. The defendant is never contacted, and no inquiry of any kind reaches them, which matters most in exactly the pre-suit window this report serves.
How do I order a collectibility assessment?
Online, at the published flat fee, with delivery in 24 to 72 hours. Provide the defendant’s full name and any known addresses or entities, and the report returns reachable equity, the creditor stack, judgment history, wrappers, and velocity, every line cited to its instrument.
Where Collectibility Cases Go Next
pre-litigation searchpost-judgment asset searchcharging order asset searchthe collection-odds guidethe $595 single-property investigationorder an asset search nowStart Your Collectibility Assessment
$195 flat fee. Delivered in 24 to 72 hours. Reachable equity, the creditor stack, judgment history, wrappers, and velocity, the five facts that price a defendant.
Order Now